Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 73
Filter
3.
Indian Pediatr ; 2019 Feb; 56(2): 101-104
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-199259

ABSTRACT

Adolescent immunization is one of the important yet a neglected field in India. There is no adolescent-specific schedule in thegovernment’s Universal Immunization Program. Though a separate adolescent immunization schedule exists for the private sector, thereis almost no data on the coverage rates of the adolescent vaccines. With the changing epidemiology of certain vaccine preventablediseases, rapid development in the field of vaccinology and the advent of some new vaccines, there is a need to revisit the adolescentvaccination schedule. Common vaccine preventable diseases like dengue, mumps, hepatitis A and typhoid should be given higher prioritywhereas an alternate strategy should be adopted on the use of the vaccine against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis

4.
Indian J Med Ethics ; 2018 Jan; 3(1): 82
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-195076

ABSTRACT

The editorial by Jesani and Johari in this journal raises some contentious yet relevant ethical issues pertaining to vaccination practices in India. Vaccination is one of the most important preventive measures against infectious diseases. The eradication of smallpox in the 70s and near eradication of polio are testimony to this. The Government of India (GoI) has recently added a few new vaccines in its Universal Immunisation Programme (UIP), one of the largest public health programmes across the globe. The number of vaccines delivered through this public health programme has doubled from six in 1985 to twelve in 2017. However, important vaccines are still not part of UIP and hence are being given through the private sector. These include vaccines against typhoid, chickenpox, hepatitis-A, HPV, MMR, etc

5.
Indian Pediatr ; 2016 Jul; 53(7): 652-653
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-179144

ABSTRACT

Documentation of rotavirus diarrhea in a rural, resource-poor setting is a difficult task. We analyzed stool samples of 103 children admitted for acute diarrhea in a pediatric hospital in Bijnor, UP, India, using a simple bedside immunochromatography kit. Rotavirus infection was detected in 47 out of total of 103 children (45.6%).

6.
Indian Pediatr ; 2016 Jul; 53(7): 649-650
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-179141
7.
Indian Pediatr ; 2016 May; 53(5): 446
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-179039
8.
Indian Pediatr ; 2016 May; 53(5): 399-402
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-178999
9.
Indian Pediatr ; 2015 Oct; 52(10): 837-839
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-172098

ABSTRACT

Live attenuated SA-14-14-2 vaccine against Japanese encephalitis (JE) was introduced in the routine immunization under Universal Immunization Program in the 181 endemic districts of India. Recently, the Government of India has announced the introduction of one dose of JE vaccine for adults in endemic districts. The policy to mass vaccinate adults has raised several concerns that are discussed in this write-up. Apart from adult vaccination, the continuation of large scale JE vaccination program despite it being a very focal problem, and continued neglect of some other serious public health illnesses have also been highlighted. The issue of lack of authentic data on effectiveness of currently employed SA-14-14-2 JE vaccine has also been discussed.

10.
Indian Pediatr ; 2015 June; 52(6): 505-514
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-171559

ABSTRACT

Justification: Mumps, despite being a widely prevalent disease in the country, is considered as an insignificant public health problem mainly because of poor documentation of clinical cases and lack of published studies. In the absence of adequate published data on disease burden, Government of India has recently decided to introduce measles-rubella (MR) vaccine in its National Immunization Program and neglected mumps component. Process: Following an IAP ACVIP meeting on December 6 and 7, 2014, a detailed review of burden of mumps in India along with vaccination strategies to control the disease was prepared. The draft was circulated amongst the members of the committee for review and approval. Revised final draft was later approved by IAP executive board in January 2015. Objectives: To provide a review of community burden of mumps in India; and to discuss the vaccination strategies to impress upon policymakers to include mumps vaccination in National immunization program. Recommendations : A total of 14 studies and two media reports on mumps outbreak were retrieved. The outbreaks were reported from all the regions of the country. Mumps meningoencephalitis was responsible for 2.3% to 14.6% of all investigated hospitalized acute encephalitis syndrome or viral encephalitis cases in different studies. Data from Infectious Disease Surveillance (ID Surv) portal of IAP and Integrated Disease Surveillance Program (IDSP) of Government of India (GoI) were also reviewed. While a total of 1052 cases were reported by the IDSurv, IDSP had investigated 72 outbreaks with 1564 cases in 14 states during different time periods. Genotypes G (subtype G2) and C were found to be main genotypes of the mumps virus circulating in the country. Three studies studied serological status of young children and adolescents against mumps, and found susceptibility rates ranging from 32% to 80% in different age groups. Conclusions: Mumps poses a significant disease burden in India. This calls for inclusion of mumps vaccine in the National immunization program.

11.
Indian Pediatr ; 2015 Mar; 52(3): 258
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-171217
12.
Indian Pediatr ; 2015 Mar; 52(3): 257
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-171212
13.
Indian Pediatr ; 2015 Jan; 52(1): 81-82
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-171051
14.
Indian Pediatr ; 2014 Nov; 51(11): 936
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-170934
15.
Indian Pediatr ; 2014 Oct; 51(10): 785-800
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-170844

ABSTRACT

Justification: There is a need to review/revise recommendations about existing vaccines in light of recent developments in the field of vaccinology. Process: Following an IAP ACVIP meeting on April 19 and 20, 2014, a draft of revised recommendations for the year 2014 and updates on certain vaccine formulations was prepared and circulated among the meeting participants to arrive at a consensus. Objectives: To review and revise recommendations for 2014 Immunization timetable for pediatricians in office practice and issue statements on certain new and existing vaccine formulations. Recommendations: The major changes in the 2014 Immunization Timetable include two doses of MMR vaccine at 9 and 15 months of age, single dose recommendation for administration of live attenuated H2 strain hepatitis A vaccine, inclusion of two new situations in ‘high-risk category of children’ in context with ‘pre-exposure prophylaxis’ of rabies, creation of a new slot at 9-12 months of age for typhoid conjugate vaccine for primary immunization, and recommendation of two doses of human papilloma virus vaccines with a minimum interval of 6 months between doses for primary schedule of adolescent/ preadolescent girls aged 9-14 years. There would not be any change to the committee’s last year’s (2013) recommendations on pertussis vaccination and administration schedule of monovalent human rotavirus vaccine. There is no need of providing additional doses of whole-cell pertussis vaccine to children who have earlier completed their primary schedule with acellular pertussis vaccine-containing products. A brief update on the new Indian Rotavirus vaccine, 116E is also provided. The committee has reviewed and offered its recommendations on the currently available pentavalent vaccine (DTwP+Hib+Hepatitis-B) combinations in Indian market. The comments and footnotes for several vaccines are also updated and revised.

16.
Indian Pediatr ; 2014 Sept; 51(9): 719-722
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-170788

ABSTRACT

The Academy’s Expert group on Immunization has discussed various issues pertaining to rubella vaccine introduction in to the Universal Immunization Program. Though the move to introduce rubella vaccine in to the UIP is laudable, the decision to overlook mumps seems inexplicable and illogical. Logistics also support the use of measles-mump and rubella (MMR) vaccine instead of measles-rubella (MR) vaccine. Regarding the timing of administration of MMR/MR vaccine, the academy recommends that the vaccine should be given early to have much higher coverage than introducing it late at the time of 1st booster of DPT. According to available evidence, both these vaccines (MMR/MR) can be given safely at different ages including at 9 months of age. The second dose should also be of the same antigen (MMR/ MR) and be given along with 1st DPT booster at 16-24 months of age.

17.
Indian Pediatr ; 2014 Apr; 51(4): 322-323
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-170595
18.
Indian Pediatr ; 2014 Mar; 51(3): 237-238
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-170559
19.
Indian Pediatr ; 2013 December; 50(12): 1109-1112
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-170088
20.
Indian Pediatr ; 2013 December; 50(12): 1095-1108
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-170086

ABSTRACT

Justification: There is a need to review/revise recommendations about existing vaccines in light of recent developments in the field of vaccinology where new developments are taking place regularly at short intervals. Process: Following an IAP ACVIP meeting on 3rd and 4th August, 2013, a draft of revised recommendations for the year 2013 and updates on certain new vaccine formulations was prepared and circulated among the meeting participants to arrive at a consensus. Objectives: To review and revise recommendations for 2013 Immunization timetable for pediatricians in office practice and issue statements on new vaccine formulations. Recommendations: The major change in the 2013 Immunization timetable was made in the recommendations pertaining to pertussis immunization. Taking in to the consideration of recent outbreaks of pertussis in many industrialized countries using acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines and subsequent finding of faster waning of the same in comparison to whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccines and superior priming with wP vaccines than aP vaccines, the committee has now recommended wP vaccines for the primary series of infant vaccination. Guidelines are now also issued on the preference/ selection of a particular aP vaccine in case it is not feasible to use wP vaccine, and use of Tdap vaccine during pregnancy. The administration schedule of monovalent human rotavirus vaccine, RV1 has been revised to 10 and 14 weeks from existing 6 and 10 weeks. Recommendation is made for the need of booster dose of live attenuated SA-14-14-2 JE vaccine. Updates and recommendations are issued on new typhoid conjugate vaccine, inactivated vero-cell culture derived SA-14- 14-2 JE vaccine, inactivated vero-cell derived Kolar strain, 821564XY JE vaccine, and new meningococcal conjugate vaccines. This year the recommended immunization schedule with range for persons aged 0 through 18 years is being published together instead of two separate schedules. A subcategory of ‘general instruction’ is added in footnotes. The comments and footnotes for several vaccines are revised and separate instructions for ‘routine vaccination’ and ‘catch-up vaccination’ are added in the footnotes section wherever applicable.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL